MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383929656

Influence of Additive on Growth and Differentiation of Cordyceps militaris (L.) fruitbody

2010· article· en· W2383929656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tao Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueShipin yu fajiao keji · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCordycepinCordyceps militarisMyceliumCitric acidFood scienceYield (engineering)CordycepsChemistryBiologyBiochemistryBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:Study the growth and differentiation of fruitbody of cordyceps militaris (L.) Link with treatment additive Method:In this experiment,the micro additives were added in the culture medium to screen optimized additive for the high yield,well quality militaris.The compounds were a growth regulator 2,4-chlorophen-oxyacetic acid (2,4-D),corn meal,citric acid triamine,colchicine,and streptomycin.The effect of those on the growth and development of cordyceps militaris was tested in the experiment.Result:The results showed that the growth of sino-canadian regulator (2,4-D) (0.14g/L) and citric acid triamine (0.6g/L) of the medium can have mycelial growth faster,fruitbody differentiation higher,fruitbody growth speeder,fruitbody color deeper and cordycepin concentration higher (0.46%).Corn flour takes mycelial growth faster but later and slower in the cultivationr.Colchicine and streptomycin can induce primordium differentiation,and enhance the capacity of the medium to inhibit other bacterium,increase the yield of fruiting bodies and its cordycepin.Conclusion:the growth regulator (2,4-D),citric acid triamine,colchicine,streptomycin were added to nutrient solution in the cordyceps cultivation to improve the yield of cordyceps fruiting body and the cordycepin contentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShipin yu fajiao kejiSame topicFungal Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207