Mental Health State and Alexithymia of Wenchuan Earthquake Rescue Officers and Soldiers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To explore the mental health state and its relationship with alexithymia of officers and soldiers who involved in Wenchuan earthquake rescue.Methods:A cross-sectional study was performed in 116 rescue soldiers and 144 soldiers who didn't have rescue mission.All the 280 soldiers were tested with Symptom Checklist-90(SCL-90),Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Self-rating Scale and the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20).Results:①The factorial scores of psychoticism,paranoid ideation of SCL-90 of the rescue team were significantly higher than those of the non-rescue team.The positive rate of SCL-90 of the rescue team(28.45%) were significantly higher than that of the non-rescue team(15.27%).②The positive rate of PTSD between the two groups was not significantly different,the re-experience factor of the rescue team was significantly higher than that of the non-rescue team.③The multiple linear regression result of SCL-90 and PTSD of the rescue team was found that,DDF and DIF entered the regression equation of SCL-90,and DIF and age entered the regression equation of PTSD.Conclusion:There is a certain degree of psychosomatic symptoms in rescue officers and soldiers after 3 months of earthquake.Their mental health state is moderately correlated with the factors of DDF and DIF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".