MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385248034

Optimization of RAPD and ISSR-PCR Reaction Systems for Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Genomic DNA

2007· article· en· W2385248034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huang Dan-qiong

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRAPDRaphanusPrimer (cosmetics)genomic DNAPolymerase chain reactionBiologyDNACultivarMolecular biologyChemistryBotanyGeneticsGeneGenetic diversityPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of different concentrations of template DNA,primer,dNTPs and Mg2+on the PCR reaction was analyzed and the optimized RAPD and ISSR-PCR systems in radish were established.The RAPD-PCR reaction was performed in a 18 L solution containing 0.4-0.6 μmol/L of RAPD primer,0.15-0.2 mmol/L of dNTPs,2.0 mmol/L of Mg2+,genomic DNA 10-40 ng and 0.8 U TaqDNA polymerase.The ISSR-PCR reaction was performed in a 16 μl solution containing 0.5 μmol/L of primer,0.16 mmol/L of dNTPs,2.5 mmol/L of Mg2+,10-40 ng template DNA and 0.64 U TaqDNA polymerase.Gradient PCR experiment showed,The annealing temperature of 35-42 ℃ (37 ℃) and 52.4-58.3 ℃(55 ℃) are suitable for RAPD and ISSR-PCR in radish,respectively.17 radish cultivars were fingerprinted with the optimized systems.The systems would play an important role in molecular breeding,cultivar fingerprinting and seed purity testing in radish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207