Preparation of flower-like Co_3O_4 microspheres for adsorption of basic fuchsin from waste water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper,two kinds of flower-like Co3O4hollow microspheres were synthesized by solvothermal process.The scanning electron microscopy(SEM),X-ray diffraction(XRD),nitrogen adsorption instrument,UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy(UV-Vis),infrared spectrometer(FT-IR)were used to characterize the size,crystal structure,pore properties of the Co3O4hollow microspheres.The results showed that the two kinds of Co3O4 microspheres are micron-sized,cubic phase spinel structure,and the specific surface area were26.77and 2.51m2/g,respectively.The adsorption and regeneration properties of the two kinds of Co3O4 microspheres to basic fuchsin were compared.The study results showed that the two kinds of Co3O4 microspheres exhibited high adsorption capacities and excellent regeneration ability to basic fuchsin.The solid-phase adsorbate concentration at equilibrium was 2.7 mg/g.After recycling 6times,the adsorption efficiency was still above 60%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".