Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Water Requirement of Baoji Reach of Weihe River
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on historical observation data and recent experimental data of Linjiacun Hydrologic Station and Weijiabu Hydrologic Station,this paper calculated the ecological water requirements of Baoji reach of the Weihe River by using the improved Tennant method,the representative year method based on guidelines for assessment of water-draw and utilization in construction projects( IGAWDU) and the dualistic water cycle method individually. The results show that: a) with the improved Tennant method,the minimum standards of ecological water requirements at the three periods of April to June,July to October and November to the next March are 8. 8 m3/ s,17. 1 m3/ s and 6. 4 m3/ s,respectively; b) with the method of IGAWDU,the average annual ecological water requirement( IGAWDU-M) is 22. 8 m3/ s; the ecological water requirements of the high flow year,the normal year,the low flow year and the special dry year are 28. 5 m3/ s,22. 9 m3/ s,16. 1 m3/ s and 10. 2 m3/ s,respectively; c) with the dualistic water cycle method,the proportion of ecological water requirement is 46. 4% and the dilution ratio is 0. 29,which shows that neither water quantity nor quality can't achieve the standard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it