Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Water Requirement of Baoji Reach of Weihe River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on historical observation data and recent experimental data of Linjiacun Hydrologic Station and Weijiabu Hydrologic Station,this paper calculated the ecological water requirements of Baoji reach of the Weihe River by using the improved Tennant method,the representative year method based on guidelines for assessment of water-draw and utilization in construction projects( IGAWDU) and the dualistic water cycle method individually. The results show that: a) with the improved Tennant method,the minimum standards of ecological water requirements at the three periods of April to June,July to October and November to the next March are 8. 8 m3/ s,17. 1 m3/ s and 6. 4 m3/ s,respectively; b) with the method of IGAWDU,the average annual ecological water requirement( IGAWDU-M) is 22. 8 m3/ s; the ecological water requirements of the high flow year,the normal year,the low flow year and the special dry year are 28. 5 m3/ s,22. 9 m3/ s,16. 1 m3/ s and 10. 2 m3/ s,respectively; c) with the dualistic water cycle method,the proportion of ecological water requirement is 46. 4% and the dilution ratio is 0. 29,which shows that neither water quantity nor quality can't achieve the standard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".