The Analysis of Subjective Well-being and its Influencing Factors in Patients with Pneumoconiosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate subjective well-being(SWB) and its influencing factors of patients with pneumoconiosis.Methods SWB were investigated in 323 patients with pneumoconiosis and the relevant factors with the questionnaire of subjective well-being of Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale(MUNSH) were further analyzed.Results MUNSH score of pneumoconiosis patients is 23.60±8.83 and the number of high SWB people is 29 and middle is 260 and low is 34.Social support,6-minute walk distance,anxiety and depression score and living in the county were related to SWB of patients with pneumoconiosis by stepwise multiple regression analysis.Conclusion Pneumoconiosis patients with middle SWB accounted for the majority.SWB of patients with pneumoconiosis is related to social support,6-minute walk distance,anxiety and depression scores and living in the county.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".