Treatment of cold-dampness obstruction syndrome of knee osteoarthritis with Sanhan Zhitong Plaster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the curative effect and safety of Sanhan Zhitong Plaster in the treatment of cold-dampness obstruction syndrome of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods KOA patients (n=578) from 4 research centers were divided, accordind to a proportion of 2:2:1, into group A (n=233, treated with Fufang Nanxing Zhitong Plaster), group B (n=230, treated with Shangshi Jietong Plaster) and group C (n=115, treated with acrylics pressure-sensitive adhesive plaster), once a day for 6 days. The cure rate, effective rate, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), integrals of TCM syndromes and adverse effects after medication were compared among three groups before and after treatment. Results All data were analyzed by using Full Analysis Set (FAS) and Per-Protocol population (PP). The curative effect was the best in group A after knee pain scoring with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The change tendency of WOMAC had statistical significance in three groups before and after treatment. The curative effect on TCM syndromes was the best in group A after data analysis with FAS. There were no serious adverse reactions observed related to experimental medicinal. Conclusion Sanhan Zhitong Plaster is safe and effective in the treatment of cold-dampness obstruction syndrome of KOA
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".