MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386434877

Influence of Nutritional and Cultural Parameters on Polysaccharide Formation by Ganoderma lucidum Grown in Submerged Culture

2011· article· en· W2386434877 on OpenAlexaff
Tang Jake

Bibliographic record

VenueShiyongjun xuebao · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysaccharideMyceliumFood scienceChemistryMushroomNutrientGanodermaChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatographyNitrogenBotanyBiochemistryBiologyGanoderma lucidumOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of various nutritional and cultural parameters(pH,temperature,nutrient nitrogen availability,C∶N ratio,agitation,inoculum size) on polysaccharide production by submerged cultures of Ganoderma lucidum grown in fermenters on a defined medium under controlled conditions have been evaluated.The bulk of the polysaccharide produced(normally more than 80%) was present in the culture fluid(extracellular polysaccharide,EPS) with usually less than 20% associated with the mycelium(mycelium-associated polysaccharide,MAP).Maximal growth and highest total(extracellular plus mycelium-associated) polysaccharide production were observed in cultures maintained at pH 5.0.Total polysaccharide production over the temperature range 28~34 ℃ was maximal in cultures maintained at 34 ℃ and decreased with a reduction in temperature.Lower nitrogen levels generally resulted in poorer mycelial growth and lower polysaccharide production.Total(mainly extracellular) polysaccharide production was increased by a larger inoculum size whereas an inverse relationship was observed between MAP and inoculum size.EPS material was separated by HPLC into two components with molecular weights of 137 kDa and 4.7 kDa,with retention times of 26.5 and 36.5 min,respectively.MAP gave a single large peak at 40 min with a molecular weight of 1.57 kDa and a much smaller peak at 28 min with a molecular weight of 76.6 kDa,and had a similar HPLC profile to the polysaccharide fraction extracted from the mushroom fruit bodies.Both EPS and MAP material produced under all the conditions adopted in this study gave consistent and reproducible chromatographic profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShiyongjun xuebaoSame topicFungal Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207