MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386684657 · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0502

Dynamic state estimation of a permanent magnet synchronous generator‐based wind turbine

2016· article· en· W2386684657 on OpenAlexaff
Sayyed Ali Akbar Shahriari, Mahdi Raoofat, Maryam Dehghani, Mohammad Mohammadi, Maarouf Saad

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Renewable Power Generation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermanent magnet synchronous generatorTurbineWind powerGenerator (circuit theory)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMagnetEstimationInduction generatorControl engineeringPermanent magnet synchronous motorAutomotive engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)Power (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise modelling, control and monitoring of machines improve the overall stability and operation of power systems. State estimation reduces the effect of noises and presents all hidden variables, which can be beneficial especially in non‐linear control. In this study, first, a complete 16th‐order state space model is developed for a grid‐connected permanent magnet synchronous generator‐based wind turbine (PMSG‐WT). Due to non‐linearity of the model, extended Kalman filtering is utilised for state estimation. A phasor measurement unit connected to permanent magnet synchronous generator bus is utilised to provide required electrical values for state estimation in a synchronous manner. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed algorithm, four different cases are studied corroborating the robustness of the proposed algorithm in the presence of high noises or in the case of large disturbances. Some comparisons are also provided with another non‐linear model proposed recently for PMSG‐WT, which verifies the advantages of the proposed model. Such results are expected to improve stability of wind farms especially in the case of large disturbances, which can lead to enhancing the whole network stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Renewable Power GenerationSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207