Clinical Control Study of Standard 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) United with the Standard Monitoring II Guide Union Monitoring Variant Angina Pectoris
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore standard 12-lead electrocardiogram(ECG) united with the standard monitoring Ⅱ guide union monitoring variant angina pectoris(variant angina pectoris,VAP) clinical control study.Methods Participants included 85 cases of patients with VAP cases as a group,to give patients after admission related suit support therapy,and random select 90 cases of healthy people without heart disease as control group,and give two group standard 12 lead ecg monitoring measures and united standard monitoring Ⅱ guide union monitoring measures.In standard 12-lead electrocardiogram(ECG) united for the gold standard,evaluation standard monitoring Ⅱ guide group methods myocardial ischemia monitoring effectiveness and sensitivity.Results In standard 12-lead electrocardiogram(ECG) united for the gold standard,the standard monitoring Ⅱ guide group only out of 64 cases of monitoring in patients with VAP,and 16 cases misdiagnosed as a healthy VAP occurs,the diagnosis of VAP were 75.3% and 82.2%,respectiely) for,positive likelihood ratio 0.80,negative likelihood ratio of 0.78.Conclusion With the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram(ECG) group,compared to standard monitoring Ⅱ guide league diagnostic sensitivity and specific degrees are relatively low,in the clinical work alone cannot rely on standard monitoring Ⅱ guide group for the diagnosis of VAP,otherwise easy to delay the treatment of patients or patients with diagnosis of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".