Cognitive impairment in male patients with obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the change of cognitive function in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS) using neuropsychological scales. Methods 152 male patients with OSAHS were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, they were divided into three groups according to apnea-hypopnea index(AHI), including mild group(n=56), moderate group(n=36)and severe group(n = 60). They were assessed by Mini Mental State Examination(MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA). Results The total scores of MoCA and MMSE decreased significantly in the severe(24.6±52.943, 26.63±2.687) male group than those in the mile(26.27±2.875, 28.07±2.271) and moderate(26.28±2.525, 27.94±2.042) groups(P0.05, P0.05). The total scores of MoCA in memory and delayed recall, attention decreased significantly in the severe(2.37±1.33, 5.08±1.06) than those in the mile(2.95±1.51, 5.63±0.66) and moderate(2.91±1.39, 5.58±0.91) groups. The total scores of MoCA and MMSE were negatively related to age, smoking index, alcohol consumption, AHI, HI, OAI, SLT90% and positively related to SaO2 min, SaO2 ave and years of education. Conclusion Compared with the mild, moderate male OSAHS patients, cognitive function declined significantly in severe male OSAHS patients, mainly perform in memory and delayed memory, attention. The total scores of MoCA and MMSE were closely related to the patient's age, years of education, smoking and drinking habits and PSG indexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".