EFFECT OF STARCHES WITH DIFFERENT DIGESTION RATES ON SERUM BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF LIPID METABOLISM IN WEANING PIG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of starches with different digestion rates on serum lipid metabolism in weaning pig. Method Eighteen pigs weaned at 21 d of age (BW 7.04 ± 0.52 kg),surgically fitted with a catheter in jugular vein,were randomly assigned to 3 dietary treatment groups,representing corn starch group (CS),sticky rice starch group (SRS) and resistant starch group (RS),respectively. Venous blood samples were taken for determining postprandial serum concentration of triglyceride (TG),cholesterol (TC),high density lipoproteins (HDL-C),low density lipoproteins (LDL-C) and activity of lipase (LPS) at different time points. Results The postprandial serum TG,TC and HDL-C,the activity of LPS and the range of variation of above parameters in pigs of SRS group were higher than those in CS and RS group (P0.05). The postprandial serum LDL-C in pigs of CS group was higher than that in SRS and RS group. Conclusion Consuming starches with different digestion rates may affect serum lipids metabolism; especially affect the metabolism of TC,which is crucial to the intelligence development in young animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".