Study on the Heredity Characteristics of Agronomic Characters of Flue-cured Tobacco-cured Tobacco
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper studied the heredity characteristics of agronomic characters of flue-cured tobacco.The results indicated that:(1)The average and coefficient of variation of agronomic characters had a certain difference.The correlation coefficients between average of crosses' number of leaves,plant height and parents average were significant at 5% level.so,to a certain extent,it could predicate the value of F1 population characters by using parents average.(2)Number of leaves was mainly controlled by additive effects,and length of leaves,width of leaves,plant height,girth of stem and internode length mainly controlled by dominance effect.(3)The additive effects values of number of leaves were high for parents P2(K326),P3(Yunyan87)and P1(G80),and could be used as parents to improve number of leaves.The additive effects values of P8(Honghuadajinyuan)were high for length of leaves,width of leaves,plant height,girth of stem and internode length.The variety could be used as parents to improve these characters.The number of leaves,width of leaves,plant height and girth of stem of P6(Jingyehuang)had highly negative additive effects,it showed that the variety was unfit for improving these characters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".