Analysis on the Epidemiological Characteristics of Water-Borne Diseases on Surveillance Points,Guangdong Province,2011
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Objective]To understand the morbidity of water-borne diseases,so as to provide scientific basis for water-borne diseases surveillance and control.[Methods]Monitoring network included 20 counties of Guangdong province.The data of residential water-borne diseases in 2011 were collected from the drinking water health surveillance reports of the National Health Supervision Information Reporting System.[Results]The total cases of water-borne diseases of the surveillance points in 2011 were 39 316 and the morbidity was 230.31/105.The proportion of cities was 91.54% and the rural areas was 8.46%;the proportions of below 6 years was 81.39%,6-11 years was 2.25%,12-17 years was 1.14%,18-60 years was 12.79% and over 60 years was 2.44%;the proportions of the infectious diarrhea,bacillary dysentery,hepatic E,typhoid fever,hepatic A,paratyphoid fever,and amoebic dysentery were individually 89.44%,7.11%,1.75%,0.74%,0.70%,0.24% and 0.02%.The proportion of the first quarter was 13.10%,the second quarter was 15.72%,the third quarter was 64.55% and the fourth quarter was 6.63%.[Conclusion]The cases of water borne diseases mainly concentrate in the cities,children below 6 years old of onset.Autumn has the highest morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".