Influencing Factor of Investment in China from Perspective of City Space
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discussed the spatial distribution features of the city-level investment in China by applying the Moran's I variable. Further,the spatial statistic empirical research on the city-level investment was conducted. The results were as follows: First,there were significantly positive correlations between investment and GDP,fiscal expenditure,finacial capital,human capital,that meant the increase of investment in a region would be drived by cumulation of these variables in the neighboring region. Second,the results of analyzing all cities in China showed that the scale of investment were affected by GDP,fiscal expenditure,finacial capital. In addition,the spatial correlation coefficient of SLM model was significant. It showed that spatial correlation was also an important factor. The impact of human capital on the scale of investment wasn't significant. Third,there were obvious differences in the influencing factor of investment in easten,central and western cities in China. In the east,the main influencing factors of investment was GDP. In the middle it was GDP,fiscal expenditure,financial capital. In the west it was GDP and fiscal expenditure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it