Bibliographic record
Abstract
'Ningqi 7'is a new wolfberry cultivar from th'eNingqi 1'production garden which planted by nature hybridization seedlings,but its plant shape characteristic is shape difference with'Ningqi 7',and the genetic background is unclear.Because of that'Ningqi 7'has very strong self-incompatibility,so it can be construct the plantation with the only variety,It shows good characteristics such as vigorous growth,high yield,the fruit-bearing branch is thickly and long,growing trend to be opened.'Ningqi 7' just has lateral flower buds primarily,and that its output is mainly depending on the branch which the same year produced to provide.Because of that the fresh fruit which has very thick fruit pulp,so it easy for drying,at the same time,the feeling in the mouth is sweet,but does not lose the Ningxia wolfberry unique medicine fragrance.The fruit average vertical diameter 2.2cm,transverse diameter 1.18cm,and the ratio of vertical diameter/transverse diameter are 2.0,fruit pulp thick 1.2 mm,average content 29 grain seeds;The ratio of fresh or dry fruit are 4.1-4.6.In dry fruit,lycium barbarum polysaccharide content,betaine content,and carotenoid content are 39.7mg·g-1,10.8 mg·g-1,1.385mg·g-1.It can cultivate in Ningxia,Qinghai,Gansu,Xinjiang where shows good characteristics and economic efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".