MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388834199

Efficacy Analysis on Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Accepting Acupuncture Treatment with Different Frequencies

2014· article· en· W2388834199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dai Zhon

Bibliographic record

VenueLiaoning zhongyi zazhi · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Venom Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZusanliMedicineAcupunctureWOMACOsteoarthritisVisual analogue scalePhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineElectroacupunctureAlternative medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of acupuncture with different frequencies on patients with knee osteoarthritis.sMethods:In a non-randomized concurrent control trial,patients with knee osteoarthritis were allocated to two treatment groups:the acupuncture group(n = 97) and the control group(n = 96).The acupuncture group received acupuncture treatment for a period of first four weeks,and followed up for four weeks after cessation of treatment.The patients in acupuncture group were divided into low-frequency group,medium-frequency group and high-frequency group according to the frequency of treatment.The waiting list control group received delayed acupuncture treatment.All patients were treated by use of eight acupuncture points:Xuehai(P10),Liangqiu(ST34),Xiyangguan(GB33),Yinlingquan(SP9),Yanglingquan(GB34),Dubi(ST35),Zusanli(ST36),and Neixiyan(EX-LE5).Patients were assessed by using the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis(WOMAC) questionnaire as major index and the Visual Analogue Pain Scale(VAS) as side index.Results:The acupuncture group showed significant improvements compared with the control group(P 0.001) at week four.There was no difference of the WOMAC and VAS scores among the low-frequency group,medium-frequency group and high-frequency group(P 0.05)at each follow-up time point.On all WOMAC subscales(pain,stiffness,and physical function),there were no significant differences among the low-frequency group,medium-frequency group and high-frequency group at week four and week eight(P 0.05).Conclusion:In our study,acupuncture seems to provide improvement in function and pain relief for knee osteoarthritis when compared with control group.There were no significant differences among the different frequency groups in terms of any of the outcomes,at each follow-up time point.Three times per week of acupuncture treatment is enough for knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiaoning zhongyi zazhiSame topicHealthcare and Venom ResearchFrench-language works237,207