Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first all-electron fully relativistic Dirac-Fock-Breit-Gaunt (DFBG), Dirac-Fock (DF), and nonrelativistic (NR) Hartree-Fock (HF) calculations are reported for octahedral (Oh) tungsten hexacarbonyl W(CO)6. Our DF and NR HF calculations predict atomization energy of 73.76 and 70.33 eV, respectively. The relativistic contribution of ∼3.4 eV to the atomization energy of W(CO)6 is fairly significant. The DF and NR energy for the reaction W + 6CO → W(CO)6 is calculated as -7.90 and -8.86 eV, respectively. The mean bond energy predicted by our NR and DF calculations is 142.5 kJ/mol and 177.5 kJ/mol, respectively, and our predicted DF mean bond energy is in excellent agreement with the experimental value of 179 kJ/mol quoted in the literature. The relativistic effects contribute ∼35 kJ/mol to the mean bond energy and the calculated BSSE is 1.6 kcal/mol, which indicates that the triple zeta basis set used here is fairly good. The mean bond energy and the atomization energy calculated in our DFBG SCF calculations, which include variationally both the relativistic and magnetic Breit effects, is 157.4 kJ/mol and 68.84 eV, respectively. The magnetic Breit effects lead to a decrease of ∼20 kJ/mol and ∼4.9 eV for the mean bond energy and atomization energy, respectively, for W(CO)6. Our calculated magnetic Breit interaction energy of -9.79 eV for the energy of reaction (ΔE) for W + 6CO → W(CO)6 is lower by ∼1.90 eV as compared to the corresponding DF value (ΔE) and contributes significantly to the ΔE. A detailed discussion is presented of electronic structure, bonding, and molecular energy levels at various levels of theory for W(CO)6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".