Assessment of Efficacy of Health Education and Exercise Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Anxiety
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the influence of health education and physical activity intervention on anxiety,sugar metabolism and subjective well-being in patients with type 2 diabetes associated with anxiety.Methods: Glycated Hemoglobin(HbA1c),Trait Anxiety Inventory(TAI) and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness(MUNSH) were used to evaluate the condition of 120 patients with type 2 diabetes associated with anxiety.The patients participated in the study were randomly divided into health education group,physical activity intervention group,health education plus physical activity intervention group and control group,with 30 cases in each group.For all patients,the original drug based therapeutic schedule maintained the same;and different interventions were given to various group.Results: After 3 months,the TAI score of patients in health education group obviously decreased;the HbA1c level of patients in physical activity intervention group also decreased;the health education plus physical activity intervention group was observed that all three indicators(HbA1c level,TAI score,MUNSH score) were obviously improved.As for the control group,the indicators were not changed before and after the study.Conclusion: Health education can obviously release anxiety;physical activity intervention can obviously improve sugar metabolism;health education plus physical activity intervention can release anxiety,improve sugar metabolism and enhance subjective well-being in patients with type 2 diabetes associated with anxiety,so it has the best effect and is worth popularizing in the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".