MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389402228

Economic or Cultural Encirclement? Differential Association in the Strategic Management of Multinational Asian and European Corporations

2015· article· en· W2389402228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBalkan and Eastern European Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinational corporationPeninsulaChinaPolitical sciencePoliticsEconomyInternational tradeGeographyBusinessEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is emerging what may be considered to be an upheaval (known in international relations as a deracinement) in strategic diplomatic, economic, intelligence, military, and trade alliances across East Asia and South Asia, followed by Eastern Europe and the Middle East, with India and Japan veering toward the Russian Federation and away from their more traditional partners: United States and Europe, and the Russian Federation unilaterally recapturing the Crimean Peninsula by force from the Republic of Ukraine. The extent to which this political and economic upheaval is likely to exert an impact upon trade relations as well as military alliances between affected countries and the West is the research focus of this article. The research question here is whether this deracinement is likely to influence changes in strategic alliances between companies in all Asian countries including the Eurasian Russian Federation and corporations in the West, not only involving those countries that are changing alliances but also China, India, and Russia (“RIC” bloc without Brasil and South Africa) and members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), in addition to American, Canadian, and European companies, in reaction, with the conclusion being that this is likely. This paper draws upon current literature in global news reports plus the author’s participant observation. The aim of this paper is to identify reasons why this scenario is emerging, why at this moment, drawing on a theory of differential association applied from other disciplines: Asian countries will construct or abandon strategic corporate alliances depending upon their perception of an excess of definitions favorable or unfavorable to changing political alliances, and many American and European firms will do the same. What are such definitions? What will most likely be the economic, political, even military consequences of this sort of realignment? Is “encirclement” the primary cause or the primary effect? This paper argues that encirclement is both cause and effect, encirclement begets more encirclement, as countries and also companies from those countries tend to align and realign culturally then economically in what one might characterise as being a “two-tailed” pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBalkan and Eastern European StudiesFrench-language works237,207