Hysteroscopic treatment of uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord-like tumor (UTROSCT)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decision to preserve the uterus in a young nulliparous woman with an extremely rare tumor is challenging. Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord-like tumor (UTROSCT) belongs to the rarest uterine pathologies. A 22-year-old nulligravida with uterine bleeding underwent a hysteroscopic resection of an intrauterine mass presumed as grade-1 submucous myoma. According to the presence of sex cord-like differentiation and positivity for calretinin, CD99, estrogen receptor, vimentin, WT1 and Melan-A, the tumor was diagnosed as UTROSCT. After 28 months, without any adjuvant therapy, the patient is still free of recurrence. This is the youngest patient with UTROSCT reported so far, with the longest follow-up among all five cases treated via hysteroscopy. Although UTROSCT has been traditionally treated with hysterectomy (with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), no established treatment protocol for UTROSCT exists. UTROSCT shows a low-malignant potential, but metastasizing and recurrent cases occur. In light of the probably less aggressive tumor biology and with respect to the patient's autonomy, a conservative, uterus preserving treatment appears to be justified in selected cases in which close follow-up can be guaranteed. Further case reports are needed to prove the safety of organ-preserving strategy in UTROSCT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".