Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the postoperative p ai n in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), ureterosco pic lithotomy (URL) or minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL). Methods All adult cases scheduled for procedure were randomize d into four groups. Group Ⅰwas performed URL: subgroup ⅠLU was left side (n=5 2), ⅠRU was right side (n=57),and ⅠDU was double side (n=1). Group Ⅱwas pe rformed MPCNL:subgroup ⅡLP was left (n=66) and ⅡRP was right (n=63). Group Ⅲ was performed TURP (n=59). Group Ⅳ:subgroup ⅣT was performed TURP (n=30),Ⅳ P was performed MPCNL (n=34). Lornoxicam was injected when the operation ended, and used with PCIA then. The maximum of pain (Pmax) and the degree of pain i n the 24th hour (P24) evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), McGill Pain Ques tionaire were tested in 24h after operation. Results Pmax or P2 4 was significant between each subgroup of group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ, and each subg roup of groupⅠ (p0.05 ). The pain site was at perineum in gro up Ⅰor Ⅲ , at the waist of operative side in group Ⅱ. Conclusion Postoperation pain should be actively reliefved after TURP or MPCNL, and Lorn oxicam is effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".