OBSERVATION ON THE CURATIVE EFFECTS OF IVERMECTIN COMBINED WITH ALBENDAZOLE AGAINST HOOKWORM AND WHIPWORM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the curative effects of ivermectin combined with albendazole against hookworm and whipworm. Methods The villagers whose stool examination for hookworm eggs was positive were treated with a single oral dose of 6 mg or 12 mg ivermectin combined with 200 mg albendazole. The villagers whose stool examination for whipworm eggs was positive were treated with a single oral dose of 12 mg ivermectin combined with 200 mg albendazole;and the villagers whose stool examination for hookworm or whipworm eggs was positive were treated with a single oral dose of 400 mg albendazole. The egg reversions were evaluated. Results 6 mg or 12 mg ivermectin combined with 200 mg albendazole was used to treat the villagers infected with hookworm,the egg reversion rate was 93.3% and 95.5% respectively. 12 mg ivermectin combined with 200 mg albendazole was used to treat the villagers infected with whipworm,the egg reversion rare was 94.3%. While a single dose of 400 mg albendazole was used to treat the villagers infected with hookworm or whipworm,the egg reversion rate was 66.7% and 47.1% respectively. Conclusion Ivermectin combined with albendazole has high curative effects against hookworm and whipworm with mild and transient side effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".