Studied on the Seed Vigor and Drought Resistance of Three Perennial Forages Belong to Bromus under PEG Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seed vigor and drought resistance of three perennial forages belong to Bromus(Bromus ciliatus,Bromus inermis,Bromus ircutensis) in the period of seed germination were compared under PEG-6000 of different levels drought stress.The results indicated that the seed vigor of Brudzynska,Bezenchukii Bromus inermis is lower under the level of 5%,but it is high under the level of 10%-20%.Relative germination rate,relative germination index,relative vigor index and drought-resistance index of the materials under the drought stress simulated by PEG were evaluated synthetically membership function method.And the drought resistance of Bromus inermis in Inner Mongolia Zheng Xiang Lan Qi and Bromus ciliatus in Ke Shi Ke Teng Qi is higher;the drought resistance of Brudzynska Bromus inermis,Bromus ciliatus 9708,Bezenchukii Bromus inermis is medial;Bromus ircutensis's in Inner Mongolia Zheng Xiang Lan Qi and Ke Shi Ke Teng Qi is low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".