MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390695202

Influence of Nicorandil and Trimetazidine on patients with recurrence of angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention

2012· article· en· W2390695202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Song Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueZhiye yu jiankang · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrimetazidineNicorandilMedicineAnginaConventional PCIMaceCardiologyPercutaneous coronary interventionEjection fractionInternal medicineAnesthesiaMyocardial infarctionHeart failure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective]To observe the therapeutic effect of Nicorandil and Trimetazidine on patients with recurrence of angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). [Methods]According to the criteria,150 patients were randomly and continuously collected from the Third Hospital of Xingtai City from October 2009 to July 2011,all patients received PCI and still had angina,and they were randomly divided into the Nicorandil group(75 cases) and the Trimetazidine group(75 cases).Two groups were given conventional secondary prevention drugs after PCI.On the basis of routine treatment,the Nicorandil group was treated with Nicorandil 10 mg by oral Administration,three times daily,and the Trimetazidine group was treated with Trimetazidine 20 mg by oral Administration,three times daily.The case numbers of angina pectoris,times and duration of angina attacks,classification of angina pectoris and the incidence rate of main adverse cardiovascular events(Mace) of patients within three months were observed.The Left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) of patients before medication and three months after medication were observed. [Results]The case numbers of angina pectoris,times of angina attacks and incidence rate of Ⅲ level angina pectoris(Canadian Cardiovascular Society) in the Nicorandil group were lower than those in the Trimetazidine group,the difference were significant(P0.05).The incidence rate of Mace in the Nicorandil group was lower than that in the Trimetazidine group,but the difference was not significant(P0.05).After three months of medication,the LVEF of the Nicorandil group and Nicorandil group had improved as compared with that before medication.After three months of medication,the LVEF of Nicorandil group was slightly higher than that of the Trimetazidine group,but the difference was not significant(P0.05). [Conclusion]On the basis of routine treatment,Nicorandil or Trimetazidine can reduce the times of heart attacks and improve the left ventricular function in patients with recurrence of angina pectoris after PCI.The effect of Nicorandil is better than that of Trimetazidine in alleviating angina pectoris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhiye yu jiankangSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207