MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391039086

Internationalization and Diversification of Higher Education——The Interview with Prof. Glen A. Jones

2008· article· en· W2391039086 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huang Fusheng

Bibliographic record

VenueKaifang jiaoyu yanjiu · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigher educationInternationalizationDiversification (marketing strategy)ChinaPoliticsPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)PopulationAsideSociologyPublic administrationEconomic growthEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of society and economy and international communication, the internationalization and diversification becomes the important characteristics of higher education in many countries. Like China, Canada is a huge country and there are major differences in the economics and geography of different regions. It is known to all that Canada has been very successful in increasing the level of education of its population. In this issue,we are honored to interview with Prof. Glen A. Jones and will know more about the higher education in Canada from the background of politics, economy and culture of the country.Prof. Glen A. Jones's research focuses on policy and politics of higher education in Canada. He is interested in the relationships between institutions of higher education and government, the relationships between institutions, and the decision making process within these institutions. Aside from the formal structures, he is curious about the role played by pressure groups and individuals both inside and outside the higher education community in influencing policy. His recent projects have included a national survey of Canadian university senates and senate members (sponsored by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), national studies of faculty and student organizations, and the critical analysis of higher education policy in Ontario. Prof. Glen A. Jones's publications include: Higher Education in Canada: Different Systems, Different Perspectives (Garland, New York, 1997); The University and the State: Reflections on the Canadian Experience (Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education, 1998); and Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance (with Alberto Amaral and Beret Karseth, Kluwer, 2002). He is currently co-editing (with Patricia McCarney and Michael Skolnik) Creating Knowledge, Strengthening Nations: The Changing role of Higher Education (University of Toronto Press).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0190.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKaifang jiaoyu yanjiuSame topicHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207