Comparative analysis of main nutritive components in edible tissues of male and female Culter erythropterus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compared the nutritive components in the edible tissues of male and female Culter erythropterus.The results reveal that no significant difference is found in the content of crude protein in the muscle between male and female(P0.05),but the content of crude protein in gonads and air bladder is significantly higher in female(28.24%,19.22%) than in male(24.89%,17.72%)(P0.05);there is no significant difference in the content of moisture in the edible tissues between male and female(P 0.05).Eighteen amino acids were discovered in the edible tissues of both male and female.The contents of total amino acids,essential amino acids and flavour amino acids in the gonads and air bladder of female are significantly higher than those of male(P0.05),but there is no significant difference in amino acid composition in the muscle between male and female(P 0.05).The composition of essential amino acids in the gonads and air bladder of male and female C.erythropterus meets the standard of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/Word Health Organization(FAO/WHO),but that in the muscle does not.It is indicated that the muscle and the gonads of C.erythropterus are more nutritive,while the air bladder has relatively low nutritional value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".