Application of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment of spasmodic torticollis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the application value of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(r TMs) in spasmodic torticollis patients. Methods Seventy-eight patients with spasmodic torticollis were randomly divided into the low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment group and the botulinum toxin type A group. Both two groups were assessed by using the Toronto torticollis rating scale(TWSTRS) and the Tsui′s scale before treatment and one week, one month, three months, six months after the treatment. Results At one week,one month, three months after the r TMs treatment,the severity,disability,pain of Tsui scores were increased significantly in the r TMs treatment group(P 0.05).Compared with the botulinum toxin type A group,no significant statistical differences were found between these two groups(P 0.05).Conclusions The effect of low frequency r TMs in the treatment for spasmodic torticollis is significant. It can be used as a noninvasive physical treatment for spasmodic torticollis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".