Uplift Processes of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Interpreted from the Comparison of Yecheng Section and Siwalik Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparative analysis of the Yecheng seciton at north piedmont of the Kunlun Mountain, and the Surai Khola section at south piedmont of the Himalayan Mountain, suggests that the Qinghai-Tibet plateau is dominated by continuous uplift over the past 10 million years, and the effective time scale for dividing the entire plateau uplift processes is 1 Ma or more. The entire process of the entire plateau can be divided into three stages based on sediment facies and deposit ratio, namely slow uplift stages between 10^0～6^0 Ma BP; transitional uplift stage between 6^0～2^5 Ma BP (including medium-velocity uplift of the south part of the plateau and low-velocity uplift of the north part of the plateau during 6^0～4^6 Ma BP; medium-velocity uplift of the south part of the plateau and high-velocity uplift of the north partole the plateau during 3^5～2^5 Ma BP), and the high-velocity uplift stage after 2^5 Ma BP. The uplift elevation of the entire plateau exceeded {2 000} m above sea level maybe by 4^6 Ma BP and exceeded{3 000} m above sea level by 2^5 Ma BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".