Study of the Correlation between Cognitive Impairment and Locus of the Mild to Moderate Cerebral Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To study the correlation between cognitive impairment and locus of the mild to moderate cerebral injury and to observe the characters of cognitive impairment with cerebral injury of different locus.Method: Cognitive function was tested with Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA) in 120 patients with cerebral injury.Correlation between the locus of cerebral injury and cognitive impairment was analyzed with 7 items(ORI,EF、NAM、MEM、ATT、LANG、ABS)of MoCA.Result: The lesions of either side of brain were no correlation(P0.05).The frontal lobe was related to ORT,EF,and MEM(P0.05),and the parietal lobe was related to EF,NAN,MEM and ATT(P0.05).The temporal lobe was related to EF,MEM and LANG(P0.05),and the basilar lesion was related to EF,MEN and LANG(P0.05).The occipital lobe and cerebellar were both not related to cognitive impairment(P0.05).Conclusion: Cognitive dysfunction is related to the locus of brain lesion in the patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury,and this is especially true for lesions in the frontal,temporal and parietal lobes.We have a higher detection rate using in MoCA on the mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".