Clinical efficacy of Wuchong Tongluo capsules combined with Western medicines in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy:a report of 60 cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of Wuchong Tongluo capsules combined with Western medicines in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy(DPN).Methods:A total of 120 patients with DPN were randomly divided into treatment group(n = 60) and control group(n = 60).Both groups received conventional treatment to have blood glucose levels controlled within a desirable range,as well as vitamin B1 tablets,mecobalamin capsules,and epalrestat tablets,and the treatment group was given Wuchong Tongluo capsules as an addition.Results:The treatment group had a significantly higher overall response rate than the control group(91.67% vs 71.67%,P 0.01).The treatment group had a significantly more improvement in total Toronto score than the control group(P 0.05).There was also significant difference in nerve conduction velocity between the treatment group and control group(P 0.01).No adverse events were seen in either group.Conclusion:Wuchong Tongluo capsules combined with Western medicines have a satisfactory clinical effect and cause no adverse events in the treatment of DPN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".