Degeneration and Instability and the Relation to Patients’ Function Late After Lumbar Disc Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the excess risk of degeneration and segmental instability in operated segments late after lumbar disc surgery in patients with presurgically stable segments, and whether local pathological findings relate to patients' back health. DESIGN: This retrospective analysis reports on 69 patients 12 years after first-time, uncomplicated lumbar disc surgery. Two independent radiologists evaluated the patients' lumbar functional x-rays; the Back Pain Rating Score (LBP-RS) assessed back-specific function. RESULTS: At 12 years after lumbar disc surgery, degenerative changes as well as segmental instability occurred significantly more frequently in the operated than nonoperated lumbar segments, but there was no association between increased degeneration and segmental instability rates. The risk for acquiring segmental instability was significantly associated with surgery (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-28.8). Prevalence of segmental instabilities was associated with better LBP-RS scores. Analyses of LBP-RS subscores revealed a clear association of segmental instability with physical function, but not with pain or activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar disc surgery seems to be associated with an increased risk of degeneration and segmental instability in the long term. This structural impairment, however, seems functionally well compensated and does not seem to be a relevant causal factor for a chronic back pain syndrome. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME OBJECTIVES:: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Describe the impact of lumbar disc surgery on segmental instability and degenerative changes; (2) Recognize the lack of association between degenerative changes and segmental instability after lumbar disc surgery; and (3) State the value of lumbar spinal functional tests in the evaluation of patients after lumbar disc surgery. LEVEL: Advanced ACCREDITATION:: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".