Protein Fractions of Wheat and Their Relationships with Noodle Quality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protein fractions quantitative of 25 Chinese wheat varieties were studied with a new protein extractionmethod, together with the relationships between protein fractions and other protein indexes, dough property, and freshnoodle quality were also studied. The average ratios of monomeric protein, soluble glutenin and insoluble glutenin of wheatin China's Huanghuai winter wheat zone was 3.7∶1.0∶1.8. Compared with Canadian wheat varieties, the monomericprotein was lower, the soluble glutenin content was higher and the insoluble protein was lower, may be it is the mainlydifference between noodle wheat and bread wheat. The monomeric protein has lesser important contribution to the noodleextension quality than glutenin. The insoluble glutenin and soluble glutenin content are significantly correlated with part ofthe rheology parameters and other protein quality index, such as sedimentation volume and swelling index of glutenin, andplay an important role to fresh noodle extension characters, for example, the fresh noodle sheet thickness and length, freshnoodle maximum resistance of extension, extension distance and extension area. The results suggested that the monomericprotein is less important than that of the glutenin for fresh noodle resistance to extension; soluble glutenin content is themost important property for noodle special wheat, and soluble glutenin content can be used for to screen Chinese noodlespecial wheat in the early stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".