Analysis of the Changes of Plasma NT-pro BNP Concentration in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure of Different Severity and the Prognosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the changes in plasma NT-pro BNP concentration in elderly patients with heart failure of different severity and the prognosis. Methods The plasma NT-pro BNP concentration was measured in 206 patients with heart failure of different severity admitted from March 2012 to December 2013 and divided into the death group and the survival group. The death group included patients with angina pectoris, recurrence of heart failure and the death cases, while the survival group did not include those with angina pectoris, recurrence of heart failure and death cases. And the changes of plasma concentration and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results The result of the data analysis showed that for patients with different causes of disease, the plasma NT-pro BNP concentrations were not the same. Compared with those without cardiovascular disease, patients with cardiovascular disease had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, with statistical significance(P0.05). The data showed that the plasma concentration of patients in the death group on admission was significantly higher than that of those in the survival group. Conclusion The analysis of the data showed that the plasma concentration of the survival group was lower than that of the death group. If the plasma concentration in patients with heart failure continues to rise, the prognosis of the patients should be paid attention, which is of great research value in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".