Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the cognitive function in middle-aged women with migraine.Methods One hundred and eight patients with migraine(50 males,58 females) were enrolled.In the 50 male patients,there were 15 cases of migraine with aura and 35 cases without aura.In the 58 females(48.74±6.61 years old),there were 15 cases of migraine with aura and 43 cases without aura.Montreal Cognitive Assessment Beijing Version was used to assess the cognitive abilities: visual-spatial concepts,naming,memory,attention,verbal fluency,abstraction,delayed word recall and orientation.Results The cognitive abilities in visual-spatial concepts,delayed word recall and abstraction in female migraine patients with aura were significantly lower than in those without aura.The total cognitive ability in female migraine patients was significantly lower than that in male migraine patients.The abstraction ability and the total cognitive ability in female migraine patients with aura decreased significantly compared with those in male migraine patients with aura.Conclusions Migraine affects cognitive function in middle-age women.The abstraction ability is remarkably reduced in female migraine patients with aura.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".