Observation of urodynamics in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the urodynamic features of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia( BPH) complicated with diabetes mellitus. Methods The Canadian Laborie urodynamic instrument was used for urodynamic testing in78 cases of BPH patients complicated with diabetes mellitus( observation group) and 80 cases of simple BPH patients( control group),and test results were compared. Results The first sensation,maximum bladder capacity,residual urine volume and bladder compliance in the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group,but maximum detrusor pressure was significantly lower than that of the control group( all P 0. 05); the proportion of impaired bladder sensation,high bladder compliance and detrusor underactivity in the observation group was higher than that of the control group( all P 0. 05),while the proportion of bladder outlet obstruction was significantly lower than that of the control group( P 0. 05). Conclusions When BPH combined with diabetes,the typical urodynamic manifestations were bladder hypoesthesia,increased bladder compliance,detrusor contraction fatigue,and increased bladder capacity and residual urine volume,meanwhile the impaired detrusor was more obvious than that of the simple BPH patients. Therefore,we should actively control blood glucose,remove the bladder outlet obstruction early and delay detrusor function damage in the treatment of BPH patients with diabetes mellitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".