Abstract P2-12-13: Modified pectoral nerves block for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: A comparative study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: The modified pectoral nerves block (Pecs II) as a method of analgesia for breast cancer surgery has shown excellent results in recent publications. This technique blocks the long thoracic nerve, thoracic intercostal nerves from T2-T6 & thoracodorsal nerve. Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecs II block for pain relief in the postoperative period of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at our instituition between November 2014 and March 2015. Patients scheduled to undergo MRM were randomly assigned to the test group (endotracheal anaesthesia along with Pecs II) and the control group (endotracheal anaesthesia only). In the postoperative period the patients were evaluated using a visual analogue scale to determine pain scores at 6, 12 & 24 hours. Results: Fifty patients (25 in each group), between the ages of 24 to 76 years (54.76 ± 10) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in ages between test & control groups. In the postoperative period, the test group had significantly lower median pain scores at 6, 12 & 24 hours as compared to the control group. Table 1: Comparative analysis for Pecs II block TestControlp valueeffect size (r)Average age (years)54.44 ± 10.7855.08 ± 9.370.824-Median postoperative pain scores 6 hours2 (1)6 (2)<0.001*- 0.8312 hours3 (1)5 (2)<0.001*- 0.6224 hours3 (1)0.034*- 0.30* statistically significant Conclusion: The modified pectoral nerves block (Pecs II) is a novel & effective technique for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Citation Format: Kanitkar R, Mane A, Agashe A, Kulkarni M, Deshmukh S. Modified pectoral nerves block for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: A comparative study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-13.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".