Bibliographic record
Abstract
23(19967)41-56 GeosciReptsShizuokaUniv23(July1996)41-56 DissoIved organic copper compoundsin seawater Yoshimi SUzUKIl AbstractTheconcentrationsofcopperOrganiccompounds dissoIvedinseawaterin the western North PacificIndian and SouthernOcean were determined from the collection of XAD-2 resin followed by atomic absorption spectrophotometryThe average concentration of totalcopper dissoIvedin surface wateris O5pgrlfor the western North Pacific07Llg 1-1for theIndianOcean andl3FJgl1for theSouthern OceanreSpeCtivly60to90of this copperis organically bound tral or basic organic compounds Theintimate correlation between acids adsorbed on the XAD-2resin POunds might tPOlymer organic ganic compounds suggests that COmPlexationThese amino acids POlynucleotides accompanied with Most of the copper Organic compounds areinvoIvedin neuwith a m01ecular size ranglng from 2103 to 2104 the organically bound copper and the combined amino indicate that theorganicligand to thecopperOrganiccom-matterThe composltion of the amino of the metal orfew speCies of amino acids are concerned with metal are not free butin a combined statesin polypeptides or Carbohydrates Key wordsCOpperSeaWatermeta1-0rganic compoundsmOlecular size lNTRODUCTJON Since the first report of BUGLIO et al(1961) who used ultra-filtration and dialysIS teChniques many researchers have tried to find evidence for the existence of organically-aSSOCiated copper dis-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.999 | 1.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".