A para-testicular primitive neuroectodermal tumor in an adult: a case report and literature review.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors describe the salient clinical, radiologic and histopathologic features of an extremely rare para-testicular primitive neuroectodermal tumor in a 25 year-old man. INTERVENTION: Excisional biopsy of the tumor en bloc was performed. Adjuvant VAdriaC-based chemotherapy (Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide) was given post-operatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histopathologic examination and immunohistochemical studies were performed on formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. RESULTS: Histologic examination showed an undifferentiated small cell tumor. The tumor cells stained positively with MIC-2, a marker specific for primitive neuroectodermal tumors. The patient is 12 months post surgery and has completed adjuvant chemotherapy with no evidence of recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: This highly unusual, peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of undifferentiated small cell neoplasms of the genitourinary system in adults, from the kidney to the testicle. We present a patient with a PNET treated based on a Ewing's family of tumors protocol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".