Bibliographic record
Abstract
Criolla or metis music emerged in two forms, religious and secular, during the 16th century in Latin America. Musical instruments, the poetic repertoire, dances and the rhythmic structure imported from the Iberian peninsula underwent major changes in the New World, especially under the influence of slaves and black freedmen. Among the new hybrid genres, fandango served as a model, even though it is hard to know much about it. Probably related to the 19th century habanera given the similar rhythmic structures, fandango seems to be the ancestor of creole forms of popular music in Latin America. These forms, despite their variety, are characterized by body movements deemed obscene by public authorities and by words that voice feelings of love laden with models of identification. In the late 19th century, creole forms of music became national emblems before, in the 20th century, turning into latinas under the influence of the United States and the entertainment industry. A separate place is to be given to what is defined as criolla music in Mexico, Cuba, Peru and Argentine, where, this music evinces, in different political contexts, the ideological place assigned to the metis phenomenon in the nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".