[Association between obesity and cognition impairment in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between obesity and cognition impairment in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). METHODS: A total of 425 eligible patients with moderate-to-severe OSAHS were screened for this retrospective study at Sleep Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University from January 2008 to January 2013. Based on body mass index (BMI), they were categorized into normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI<24, n = 67), mild overweight (24 ≤ BMI<26, n = 100), severe overweight (26 ≤ BMI<28, n = 134) and obese (BMI ≥ 28, n = 124) groups. They were examined by overnight polysomnography (PSG). And cognitive functions were assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaires. MoCA scores, clinical and polysomnographic variables were compared between the groups. And the correlations between MoCA scores and clinical and PSG parameters were further evaluated by stepwise multivariate regression. Two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was performed to examine the effects of obesity and OSAHS on MoCA score. RESULTS: The scores of MoCA progressively decreased across the spectrum from mild overweight to obese groups. The highest BMI group (obese group) had the lowest MoCA score (25.45 ± 2.35 vs 26.26 ± 2.01, 26.29 ± 2.60, 26.05 ± 2.51, P = 0.030, 0.010, 0.048). The evaluations of MoCA subdomains further revealed selective reductions. Compare to normal weight group, the score of visuospatial and executive function, memory/delayed recall significant decreased in obese and severe overweight groups (visuospatial and executive function: 4.48 ± 0.63 vs 4.07 ± 0.94, 4.13 ± 1.04, P = 0.022, 0.048; memory/delayed recall: 3.54 ± 0.90 vs 2.77 ± 1.20, 2.87 ± 1.30, P = 0.001, 0.004). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that MoCA scores were correlated significantly with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), BMI, age and years of education. Two-way ANOVA revealed that both obesity and OSAHS had independent effects on MoCA score (P = 0.004). The interactions between the effect of obesity and OSAHS on cognitive score were insignificant. It indicated that the effect of BMI on cognitive function did not change with AHI. CONCLUSIONS: In OSAHS patients, obesity aggravates cognitive impairment independently of AHI. And obesity is one of the most important influencing factors of cognitive function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".