MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2395750324

Expression of QK/QR/RRRAA or DERAA motifs at the third hypervariable region of HLA-DRB1 and disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis.

2002· article· en· W2395750324 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Khani-Hanjani, Diane Lacaille, Cathy Horne, Andrew Chalmers, David I. Hoar, Robert Balshaw, Paul Keown

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsArthritis Research Centre of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisAlleleHypervariable regionInternal medicineGastroenterologyLocus (genetics)Rheumatoid factorTypingAutoimmune diseaseImmunopathologyArthritisHuman leukocyte antigenHLA-DRB1DiseaseImmunologyAntibodyAntigenGeneticsBiologyGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between disease severity in patients with confirmed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the carriage of alleles expressing the high risk epitope (HRE) QK/QR/RRRAA or the low risk epitope (LRE) DERAA at positions 70-74 of the third hypervariable region of HLA-DRB1. METHODS: A case-control design to compare allele carriage rates in 204 Caucasian subjects with severe RA and mild RA and healthy controls. Patients had a mean disease duration of 12-18 years and severity of RA was defined using clinical and therapeutic criteria. Molecular typing at the HLA-DRB1 locus was performed using a polymerase chain reaction method. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of patients (52/60) with severe RA had one or more of the alleles bearing the QK/QR/RRRAA motif or HRE, compared with 54% (21/39) with mild RA (OR 5.57, p = 0.0007) and 39% (41/105) of controls (OR 10.15, p < 0.0001). Twenty-five percent of patients (15/60) with severe disease expressed 2 disease associated HRE DRB1 alleles, compared with 13% of patients (5/39) with mild disease (OR 2.3, p = NS) and 5% (5/105) of controls (OR 6.67, p = 0.0003). In contrast, only 5% of patients (3/60) with severe RA expressed one of the LRE alleles that carry the DERAA motif at positions 70-74, compared with 31% of patients (12/39) with mild RA (OR 0.12, p = 0.0013) and 22% of controls (23/105) (OR 0.19, p = 0.0082). No patient or control was homozygous for LRE alleles. Eighty-three percent (50/60) of patients with severe RA expressed the HRE without the LRE, compared with 44% (17/39) of those with mild disease (OR 6.47, p < 0.0001) and 35% (37/105) of controls (OR 9.19, p < 0.0001). In contrast, only one patient (2%) with severe disease expressed the LRE without the HRE, compared with 20% (8/39) of those with mild disease (OR 0.07, p = 0.0047) and 16% (17/105) of controls (OR 0.09, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference between the 3 groups in the frequency of patients who expressed both or neither epitope. Logistic regression showed that age at disease onset (p = 0.0009), duration of disease (p = 0.007), positive rheumatoid factor status (p = 0.003), and presence of the HRE or LRE (p = 0.00005) were significantly associated with the presence of severe disease. CONCLUSION: HLA-DRB1 alleles appear to confer an important bidirectional influence on the risk of disease severity in RA, with 20-fold difference in OR between those associated with the highest (HLA-DRB1*0401) and lowest (HLA-DRB1*1301/02) risk. The HRE and LRE exhibit diametrically opposed effects, which may be mutually antagonistic. These data support a multistep pathogenesis in which MHC class II genes are one component of a coordinate genetic and environmental interaction leading to immunological injury and joint destruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→