MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2395993542 · doi:10.2514/1.j054820

Coherent Structures in the Transition Process of a Laminar Separation Bubble

2016· article· en· W2395993542 on OpenAlexafffund
John W. Kurelek, Andrew Lambert, Serhiy Yarusevych

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMechanicsReynolds numberVortexLaminar flowBubbleFlow separationAngle of attackParticle image velocimetryBoundary layerAirfoilBreakupPhysicsFlow visualizationMaterials scienceVortex sheddingTurbulenceOpticsAerodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coherent structures formed within the laminar separation bubble on the suction side of a NACA 0018 airfoil at a chord Reynolds number of 100,000 and an angle of attack of 5 deg are investigated experimentally using a combination of surface pressure measurements; time-resolved flow visualization; and time-resolved planar two-component particle image velocimetry. The results show that strongly periodic shear-layer vortices form in the separation bubble due to the amplification of disturbances in the fore portion of the bubble. These structures feature strong spanwise coherence at rollup; however, they deform rapidly upstream of the mean reattachment location. Spanwise undulations in the vortex filaments develop in a nonperiodic fashion, with the spanwise wavelength shown to be approximately two times the streamwise spacing of the shed structures. It is demonstrated that these spanwise deformations lead to regions of local vortex breakup, which expand rapidly as the vortices approach the mean reattachment point. This is associated with a rapid decay of the spanwise coherence length, which reaches a constant minimum value typical of turbulent boundary layers just downstream of mean reattachment. The results demonstrate that the development of shear-layer vortices plays the fundamental role in the formation of the separation bubble, and the later stages of transition are directly related to the breakup of these structures in the aft portion of the separation bubble.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA JournalSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207