Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the iris-claw phakic intraocular lens for high myopia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the in situ relative intraocular position of the Ophtec Artisan iris-claw phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) for high myopia using ultrasound biomicroscopy. METHODS: Three PIOLs (13.00, 17.00 and 18.00 D lens powers) were implanted in phakic myopic eyes. Using ultrasound biomicroscopy, echograms were taken in the anterior chamber to measure the preoperative anterior chamber depth, postoperative distance between the PIOL and the corneal endothelium (endothelial-optic distance), and the postoperative distance between the PIOL and the crystalline lens. RESULTS: Preoperative anterior chamber depth ranged from 3.10 to 3.40 mm and the postoperative endothelial-optic distance measured 2.11 to 2.44 mm. The distance between the crystalline lens and the posterior surface of the IOL ranged from 0.78 to 0.93 mm. Several echograms revealed the position of the PIOL on the iris. The pigment layer of the iris did not seem to be disturbed by the presence of the PIOL. CONCLUSION: The original anterior chamber depths were reduced by 28% to 34% after implantation. The PIOL-crystalline lens distance ranged from 0.78 to 0.93 mm. This study of 3 eyes revealed that echograms taken by ultrasound biomicroscopy are useful in verifying the intraocular position of the PIOL within the anterior chamber.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".