Factors Affecting Grafting Density in Surface‐Initiated ATRP: A Simulation Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization, knowledge of grafting density is of significant interest because it is one of the determining properties of grafted polymer. It is well known that not all of the immobilized initiators can grow into polymer chains. However, little is known about why this happens and what affects the grafting efficiency. The lack of information is partly due to the difficulty in experimental determination of grafting density on flat substrates. To circumvent the problem, Monte Carlo simulation with bond fluctuation model is used in this study to investigate the effects of various reaction conditions on the grafting density. The simulation results show lower grafting density when less deactivator is present. In systems with lower deactivator concentration, the number of monomer added per activation cycle is higher. Coupling this with close proximity of immobilized initiators results in chains initiated at earlier time to shield their neighboring initiator moieties from adding monomers, thus lowering the grafting density in such a system. These simulation results also provide an explanation to the seemingly conflicting trend reported in the literatures. image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it