[Evaluation of outcomes following total hip arthroplasty].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the hip, one of the most frequent civilization diseases, causes not only a large physical and psychological stress for the patients but also generates increasing costs of treatment each year. The aim of our study was to evaluate the patients' functioning in the period of 3-12 years after the Zweymüller total hip arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 323 patients, aged 27-83 years, after the primary Zweymüller cementless total hip arthroplasty, operated in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of Poznań University of Medical Sciences. The evaluation was based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire supported with additional questions concerning the weight, height, dwelling place, education level, occupational activity, additional diseases and other joints problems. RESULTS: The Zweymüller cementless total hip arthroplasty is characterized by a good stability in 97.8% of patients during the 3-12 years of postoperational period. Additional problems associated with any unoperated lower limb joint almost always result in the increase of the WOMAC score. A positive correlation was also noticed between the level of education and the occupational activity after the treatment in patients with similar WOMAC score. No influence of overweight on the postoperative activity occured. Moreover our study revealed a negative correlation between BMI (Body Mass Index--range up to 40) and the WOMAC form. CONCLUSIONS: The functional evaluation of patients after total hip arthroplasty should consider information about other lower limbs joints problems for better objectivity. It should be mentioned that the occupational activity correlates positively with the level of patients education. The obesity cannot be the criteria disqualifying from the operation as it does not influence the activity after the hip replacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".