MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2396918004 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-01/27/1624

Anodes Derived from Fluorite-Type and Perovskite-Type Metal Oxides for SOFCs

2015· article· en· W2396918004 on OpenAlexaff
Venkataraman Thangadurai, Kalpana Singh, Hala T. Handal, Behzad Mirfakhraei

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeOxideMaterials sciencePerovskite (structure)SulfurSolid oxide fuel cellCatalysisYttria-stabilized zirconiaMetalInorganic chemistryCarbon fibersComposite numberChemical engineeringCubic zirconiaChemistryMetallurgyCeramicElectrodeOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are alternative energy conversion devices, which deliver high quality power with a high efficiency using variety of fuels, including H2 and hydrocarbons. At present, composite Ni with Y-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) is widely used as an anode for SOFCs [1]. However, technical challenges due to coking and sulfur poisoning are yet to overcome when direct hydrocarbon-containing fuels are used. Ni not only possess good catalytic activity towards H2 oxidation and hydrocarbon reforming, it also catalyses carbon formation and poorly resists sulfur poisoning [2]. To overcome these problems, several alternatives such as Cu/CeO2/YSZ [3] and LSCM (La1-xSrxCr1-xMnxO3) [4] have been investigated. Though, these materials were able to resist coke and sulfur poisoning, they were not able to satisfy all the requirements of ideal SOFC anodes. In the present study, mixed ionic electronic conducting (MIECs) Ce0.8Y0.1Mn0.1O2- d and BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1M0.1O3−δ (M = Ni and Co), and composite Ni and Ba0.5Sr0.5Ce0.6Zr0.2Gd0.1Y0.1O3-δ (BSCZGY) have been investigated as SOFC anodes. The cell performance of a button cell: Ce0.8Y0.1Mn0.1O2- d/Zr0.84Y0.16O2- d/La0.6Sr0.4MnO3+Zr0.84Y0.16O2- d was tested at 800 oC in 3 % H2O-H2 as a fuel and air as an oxidant. There was an obvious enhancement of the cell performance upon exposure to 10 ppm H2S-H2 for 48 h. Another area of the MIEC anodes development involves investigation of perovskite-type BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1M0.1O3−δ (M = Ni and Co). The BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Ni0.1O3−δ compound shows a promising low polarization resistance of 0.4 Ω.cm2 at 800oC in H2. Low polarization resistance of the BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Ni0.1O3−δ perovskite, as a non-composite anode without any additional electron conductive phase, makes it a promising material for SOFC anodes. Proton conducting doped BaCeO3 materials is the frontrunners as electrolyte in the field of low temperature (400-700 oC) proton-SOFCs. A and B site co-doped Ba0.5Sr0.5Ce0.6Zr0.2Gd0.1Y0.1O3-δ has shown good chemical stability in CO2 and humid atmospheres at elevated temperature [5]. In the present work, anode performance of Ni-BSCZGY composites (with Ni: BSCZGY ratios as 30:70, 40:60 and 50:50) has been studied. Screen-printing and co-firing processes were employed to make symmetrical cell: Ni-BSCZGY/BSCZGY/Ni-BSCZGY. Area specific resistance (ASR), capacitance and activation energy values were studied to evaluate the electrochemical performance of the anode composites. 50:50 composite shows the lowest ASR value among the current investigated anode compositions (30:70 and 50:50). References 1) M. Ihara, T. Kusano and C. Yokoyama, J. Electrochem. Soc., 148, A209 (2001). 2) Zhe Cheng and Meilin Liu, Solid State Ionics, 178, 925 (2007). 3) H. Kim, S. Park, J.M. Vohs and R.J. Gorte, J. Electrochem. Soc., 148, A693 (2001). 4) S. Tao and J.T.S. Irvine, Nature Letters, 2, 320 (2003). 5) R. Kannan, S. Gill, K. Singh, T. Fürstenhaupt and V. Thangadurai, Sci. Report, 3, 2138 (2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207