Rapid molecular diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis using the Gen-probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis direct test in a large Canadian public health laboratory.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A 5-year retrospective study of the performance of the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD) for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Patient data from culture-confirmed cases of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) were also analysed. RESULTS: In total, 311 CSF specimens were tested by the MTD, of which 17 were positive. When compared with culture (gold standard), the sensitivity and specificity of the MTD test were 93.8% and 99.3%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for TBM were 88.2%, and 99.7%. Clinical and epidemiological information was requested for all culture-positive TBM patients. These data were used to assess the mortality rate (55.6%) and to determine common factors that could be applied as selection criteria for the appropriate testing of CSF by MTD. CONCLUSION: The study found the MTD test to be a rapid, sensitive and specific test for TBM. A history of immigration from an area endemic for tuberculosis (TB), a history of TB, symptoms of neurological deficits and the results of CSF analyses could be used to appropriately select CSF for MTD testing in order to provide a critical early diagnosis of TBM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it