Reviews <i>Too Expensive to Treat? Finitude, Tragedy, and the Neonatal ICU</i> by CamosyC. C., Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans. <i>Dementia Care with Black and Latino Families: A Social Work Problem-Solving Approach</i> by SandersGonzalez Delia J. and FortinskyRichard H.New York: Springer, 2012. <i>Spirituality for America: Earth-Saving Wisdom from the Indigenous</i> , by McGaaEd. Minneapolis, MN: Four Directions Publishing, 2013. <i>Bereavement after Traumatic Death: Helping the Survivors</i> , edited by De LeoDiego, CimitanAlberta, DyregrovKari, GradOnja and AndriessenKarl, Toronto, Ontario: Hogrefe, 2014.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As we move into this new year, we want to thank the many of you who keep me posted about the “good stuff” that deserve to be shared with others. A number of you have been reviewers, and we always need more. There is no shortage of books and the top publishers internationally recognize the value as one of the best ways for them to reach their “customers.” We hope to expand our already rich resources on loss as we continue to expand our awareness of, and response to the many challenges and opportunities that come to this ever-shrinking planet. We hope to expand our attention to the needs of children and teens, those who walk alone, and for older adults. If you come across a book or resource we should look at, please send them to me at 1484 N. Academy Street, Galesburg, IL 61401. (309) 351–7447. This issue is dedicated to the many who share in the work we all do, and the many who have died, with special remembrance of Darcie Sims and Marv Johnson.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".