Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given a set [Formula: see text] of points and a point [Formula: see text] in the plane, we define a function [Formula: see text] that provides a combinatorial characterization of the multiset of values [Formula: see text], where for each [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is the open half-plane determined by [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We introduce two new natural measures of depth, perihedral depth and eutomic depth, and we show how to express these and the well-known simplicial and Tukey depths concisely in terms of [Formula: see text]. The perihedral and eutomic depths of [Formula: see text] with respect to [Formula: see text] correspond respectively to the number of subsets of [Formula: see text] whose convex hull contains [Formula: see text], and the number of combinatorially distinct bisections of [Formula: see text] determined by a line through [Formula: see text]. We present algorithms to compute the depth of an arbitrary query point in [Formula: see text] time and medians (deepest points) with respect to these depth measures in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] time respectively. For comparison, these results match or slightly improve on the corresponding best-known running times for simplicial depth, whose definition involves similar combinatorial complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it