On Combinatorial Depth Measures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given a set [Formula: see text] of points and a point [Formula: see text] in the plane, we define a function [Formula: see text] that provides a combinatorial characterization of the multiset of values [Formula: see text], where for each [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is the open half-plane determined by [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We introduce two new natural measures of depth, perihedral depth and eutomic depth, and we show how to express these and the well-known simplicial and Tukey depths concisely in terms of [Formula: see text]. The perihedral and eutomic depths of [Formula: see text] with respect to [Formula: see text] correspond respectively to the number of subsets of [Formula: see text] whose convex hull contains [Formula: see text], and the number of combinatorially distinct bisections of [Formula: see text] determined by a line through [Formula: see text]. We present algorithms to compute the depth of an arbitrary query point in [Formula: see text] time and medians (deepest points) with respect to these depth measures in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] time respectively. For comparison, these results match or slightly improve on the corresponding best-known running times for simplicial depth, whose definition involves similar combinatorial complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".